Alma Highland Festival

Calculated ranking scores by grade and set

Competition Info
Date
May 23, 2026
Location
Alma
Bands / Results
16 bands · 23 results

Competition Results with Calculated Scores

2
2 bands 4 results
MSR
2 bands
Place Band Positions PU Q_P1 Q_P2 Q_D Q_E Q Delta Rating Actions
1 Midlothian Scottish Pipe Band
Lombard, Illinois
P1: 1, P2: 1
D: 2, E: 1
100.0 100.0 100.0 85.71 100.0 95.71 5.67 1517.36
2 Great Lakes Pipe Band
Cleveland, Ohio
P1: 2, P2: 2
D: 1, E: 2
85.71 85.71 85.71 100.0 85.71 90.0 2.66 1528.28
Medley
2 bands
Place Band Positions PU Q_P1 Q_P2 Q_D Q_E Q Delta Rating Actions
1 Midlothian Scottish Pipe Band
Lombard, Illinois
P1: 2, P2: 1
D: 2, E: 1
100.0 85.71 100.0 85.71 100.0 92.14 4.2 1511.69
2 Great Lakes Pipe Band
Cleveland, Ohio
P1: 1, P2: 2
D: 1, E: 2
85.71 100.0 85.71 100.0 85.71 93.57 4.4 1525.62
4
5 bands 10 results
MSR
5 bands
Place Band Positions PU Q_P1 Q_P2 Q_D Q_E Q Delta Rating Actions
1 Cabar Feidh Pipes & Drums
Royal Oak, Michigan
P1: 2, P2: 2
D: 2, E: 1
100.0 85.71 85.71 85.71 100.0 88.57 3.43 1485.15
2 Capital City Pipes & Drums (Gr. 4)
Columbus, Ohio
P1: 1, P2: 1
D: 4, E: 3
85.71 100.0 100.0 57.14 71.43 81.43 0.99 1513.96
3 87th Cleveland Pipe Band (Gr. 4)
Brook Park, Ohio
P1: 3, P2: 4
D: 1, E: 2
71.43 71.43 57.14 100.0 85.71 79.29 0.06 1506.89
4 Michigan Scottish Pipes & Drums
Grosse Pointe Woods, Michigan
P1: 4, P2: 3
D: 3, E: 5
57.14 57.14 71.43 71.43 42.86 62.14 -4.73 1476.92
5 Caledonia Kilty Pipe Band
Mishawaka, Indiana
P1: 5, P2: 5
D: 5, E: 4
42.86 42.86 42.86 42.86 57.14 45.71 -8.08 1463.23
Medley
5 bands
Place Band Positions PU Q_P1 Q_P2 Q_D Q_E Q Delta Rating Actions
1 Cabar Feidh Pipes & Drums
Royal Oak, Michigan
P1: 2, P2: 1
D: 2, E: 1
100.0 85.71 100.0 85.71 100.0 92.14 5.2 1481.72
2 Capital City Pipes & Drums (Gr. 4)
Columbus, Ohio
P1: 1, P2: 2
D: 4, E: 4
85.71 100.0 85.71 57.14 57.14 75.0 -1.3 1512.98
3 87th Cleveland Pipe Band (Gr. 4)
Brook Park, Ohio
P1: 3, P2: 4
D: 1, E: 3
71.43 71.43 57.14 100.0 71.43 76.43 -0.93 1506.82
4 Michigan Scottish Pipes & Drums
Grosse Pointe Woods, Michigan
P1: 5, P2: 5
D: 3, E: 2
57.14 42.86 42.86 71.43 85.71 60.0 -5.05 1481.65
5 Caledonia Kilty Pipe Band
Mishawaka, Indiana
P1: 4, P2: 3
D: 5, E: 5
42.86 57.14 71.43 42.86 42.86 53.57 -6.53 1471.31
5
9 bands
March
9 bands
Place Band Positions PU Q_P1 Q_P2 Q_D Q_E Q Delta Rating Actions
1 87th Cleveland Pipe Band (Gr. 5)
Brook Park, Ohio
P1: 3, P2: 3
D: 1, E: 2
100.0 77.78 77.78 100.0 88.89 86.67 6.52 1513.95
2 Gael Force Pipe Band
Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario
P1: 1, P2: 1
D: 4, E: 4
88.89 100.0 100.0 66.67 66.67 83.33 5.75 1514.8
3 Grand Rapids Police Pipe Band
Grand Rapids, Michigan
P1: 2, P2: 2
D: 6, E: 1
77.78 88.89 88.89 44.44 100.0 77.78 4.83 1504.83
4 Chicago Highlanders Pipes & Drums
Long Grove, Illinois
P1: 4, P2: 4
D: 3, E: 5
66.67 66.67 66.67 77.78 55.56 67.78 2.72 1501.04
5 Grand Traverse Pipes & Drums
Traverse City, Michigan
P1: 7, P2: 7
D: 2, E: 3
55.56 33.33 33.33 88.89 77.78 58.89 0.3 1514.6
6 Flint Scottish Pipe Band
Flint, Michigan
P1: 5, P2: 5
D: 9, E: 6
44.44 55.56 55.56 11.11 44.44 40.0 -3.16 1491.12
7 Grand Rapids & District Pipe Band
Grand Rapids, Michigan
P1: 6, P2: 6
D: 5, E: 8
33.33 44.44 44.44 55.56 22.22 43.33 -2.43 1491.54
8 St. Andrew's Pipe Band Of Detroit
Detroit, Michigan
P1: 8, P2: 8
D: 8, E: 7
22.22 22.22 22.22 22.22 33.33 24.44 -6.69 1493.31
9 White Pine Pipes & Drums
Midland, Michigan
P1: 9, P2: 9
D: 7, E: 9
11.11 11.11 11.11 33.33 11.11 17.78 -7.84 1482.56
Score Statistics
Highest Delta
6.52
Lowest Delta
-8.08
Bands Scored
16
Grade Distribution
2 2 bands
2
4 5 bands
5
5 9 bands
9
Scoring Explanation
  • PU (Placing Units): Base score from overall position
  • Q_P1/Q_P2: Qualified piping scores (Piping 1 & 2)
  • Q_D: Qualified drumming score
  • Q_E: Qualified ensemble score
  • Q: Overall qualified score (weighted average)
  • Delta: Rating change for this event
  • Rating: Elo-like rating after this event
  • Scores are calculated using current ranking parameters
  • Higher positions (1st, 2nd, etc.) generate higher scores
  • Piping, drumming, and ensemble outcomes drive rating changes