Woodland Celtic Games & Festival

Calculated ranking scores by grade and set

Competition Info
Date
April 11, 2026
Location
Woodland
Bands / Results
13 bands · 22 results

Competition Results with Calculated Scores

3
4 bands 8 results
MSR
4 bands
Place Band Positions PU Q_P1 Q_P2 Q_D Q_E Q Delta Rating Actions
1 St. Thomas Episcopal School Pipe Band
Houston, Texas
P1: 1, P2: 1
D: 2, E: 1
100.0 100.0 100.0 87.5 100.0 96.25 6.04 1523.35
2 Prince Charles Pipe Band (Gr. 3)
San Rafael, California
P1: 2, P2: 2
D: 1, E: 2
87.5 87.5 87.5 100.0 87.5 91.25 3.67 1526.69
3 City of Angels Pipe Band
Los Angeles, California
P1: 3, P2: 3
D: 4, E: 3
75.0 75.0 75.0 62.5 75.0 71.25 -5.08 1506.13
4 Pasadena Scottish Pipes & Drums (Gr. 3)
Pasadena, California
P1: 3, P2: 4
D: 3, E: 4
62.5 75.0 62.5 75.0 62.5 69.38 -4.38 1458.39
Medley
4 bands
Place Band Positions PU Q_P1 Q_P2 Q_D Q_E Q Delta Rating Actions
1 Prince Charles Pipe Band (Gr. 3)
San Rafael, California
P1: 2, P2: 2
D: 1, E: 1
100.0 90.91 90.91 100.0 100.0 95.45 4.22 1523.02
2 St. Thomas Episcopal School Pipe Band
Houston, Texas
P1: 1, P2: 1
D: 2, E: 2
90.91 100.0 100.0 90.91 90.91 95.45 4.4 1517.31
3 City of Angels Pipe Band
Los Angeles, California
P1: 3, P2: 3
D: 3, E: 3
81.82 81.82 81.82 81.82 81.82 81.82 -3.33 1511.21
4 Pasadena Scottish Pipes & Drums (Gr. 3)
Pasadena, California
P1: 4, P2: 4
D: 4, E: 4
72.73 72.73 72.73 72.73 72.73 72.73 -5.78 1462.77
4
5 bands 9 results
MSR
4 bands
Place Band Positions PU Q_P1 Q_P2 Q_D Q_E Q Delta Rating Actions
1 City of Sacramento Pipe Band (Gr. JUV)
Sacramento, California
P1: 1, P2: 1
D: 1, E: 1
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 7.99 1515.67
2 Humboldt Highlanders Pipe Band
Arcata, California
P1: 3, P2: 2
D: 3, E: 2
87.5 75.0 87.5 75.0 87.5 80.62 -0.71 1502.3
3 Jefferson Pipe Band (Gr. 4)
Medford, Oregon
P1: 2, P2: 3
D: 2, E: 3
75.0 87.5 75.0 87.5 75.0 81.88 0.7 1487.25
4 Irish Pipers Band of San Fransisco
San Francisco, California
P1: 4, P2: 4
D: 4, E: 4
62.5 62.5 62.5 62.5 62.5 62.5 -8.24 1481.42
Medley
5 bands
Place Band Positions PU Q_P1 Q_P2 Q_D Q_E Q Delta Rating Actions
1 City of Sacramento Pipe Band (Gr. JUV)
Sacramento, California
P1: 1, P2: 1
D: 1, E: 1
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 7.67 1507.67
2 Silicon Valley Pipe Band (Gr. 4)
Saratoga, California
P1: 2, P2: 2
D: 2, E: 2
90.91 90.91 90.91 90.91 90.91 90.91 2.12 1495.3
3 Irish Pipers Band of San Fransisco
San Francisco, California
P1: 4, P2: 4
D: 3, E: 3
81.82 72.73 72.73 81.82 81.82 77.27 -4.63 1489.66
4 Jefferson Pipe Band (Gr. 4)
Medford, Oregon
P1: 3, P2: 3
D: 4, E: 4
72.73 81.82 81.82 72.73 72.73 77.27 -4.54 1486.55
5 Humboldt Highlanders Pipe Band
Arcata, California
P1: 5, P2: 5
D: 5, E: 5
63.64 63.64 63.64 63.64 63.64 63.64 -10.0 1503.01
5
4 bands 5 results
March
3 bands
Place Band Positions PU Q_P1 Q_P2 Q_D Q_E Q Delta Rating Actions
1 Prince Charles Pipe Band (Gr. JUV)
San Rafael, California
P1: 1, P2: 1
D: 1, E: 1
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 9.35 1512.9
2 Irish Pipers Band of San Fransisco
San Francisco, California
P1: 2, P2: 2
D: 3, E: 2
66.67 66.67 66.67 33.33 66.67 56.67 -2.98 1497.02
3 Jefferson Pipe Band (Gr. 5)
Medford, Oregon
P1: 3, P2: 3
D: 2, E: 3
33.33 33.33 33.33 66.67 33.33 43.33 -6.37 1482.79
Medley
2 bands
Place Band Positions PU Q_P1 Q_P2 Q_D Q_E Q Delta Rating Actions
1 Jefferson Pipe Band (Gr. 5)
Medford, Oregon
P1: 1, P2: 1
D: 1, E: 1
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 8.19 1490.98
2 Irish Pipers Band of San Fransisco
San Francisco, California
P1: 2, P2: 2
D: 2, E: 2
90.91 90.91 90.91 90.91 90.91 90.91 1.66 1509.93
Score Statistics
Highest Delta
9.35
Lowest Delta
-10.00
Bands Scored
13
Grade Distribution
3 4 bands
4
4 5 bands
5
5 4 bands
4
Scoring Explanation
  • PU (Placing Units): Base score from overall position
  • Q_P1/Q_P2: Qualified piping scores (Piping 1 & 2)
  • Q_D: Qualified drumming score
  • Q_E: Qualified ensemble score
  • Q: Overall qualified score (weighted average)
  • Delta: Rating change for this event
  • Rating: Elo-like rating after this event
  • Scores are calculated using current ranking parameters
  • Higher positions (1st, 2nd, etc.) generate higher scores
  • Piping, drumming, and ensemble outcomes drive rating changes